Google Bomb the AVN
So, the Australian Vaccination Network has had their arse handed to them. The media no longer seems to call on them for "balance" and they're regularly being taken to task on the radio. Since the HCCC reached their conclusion and Ken McLeod released it to the world I can only think of one interview where Meryl Dorey was not taken to task. It does indeed feel like the Australian Vaccination Network is finally circling the drain.
Dorey remains adamant that the HCCC has no jurisdiction over the AVN but given what the stated goal of the AVN I can't see how they can possibly win that argument. They may still be seeking legal advice but it'll just be throwing good money after bad. If some lawyer lines their pockets from this and the AVN go bankrupt due to legal fees, I'm oddly okay with that.
The Government is not "pro-vaccination"
I would like to address one point that no one else seems to have addressed and I think would be the perfect counter to something Meryl constantly claims.
Meryl is always saying that the government is pro-vaccine. I would like to posit that this is not the case. They may promote vaccines, but it's not because they're pro-vaccine. It's more of a side effect of the actual policy. Surely the government is pro-evidence based medicine? If, tomorrow, it was found that vaccines are actually much worse than what they claim to prevent surely they would switch their position and withdraw them from the recommended list of "good things you should do". The fact is that the evidence for vaccination being better than the alternative is what puts the government into that position.
I'd like to encourage people to get that message out there. If enough people see it hopefully someone interviewing Meryl will recall this and counter with it.
Google-bombing
Google bombing is the act of linking a set of words to a url and through sheer weight of numbers having that url appear higher up the list of search results than the target of the attack.
I would like to recommend that from this day forward, any mention of the Australian Vaccination Network be linked to the public announcement from the HCCC. The goal is to get the public announcement right up there with the AVN in the search results.
Further reading:
- The AVN shoots themselves in the foot- @DrRachie
- Anti-Vaccine Group A Threat – StopAVN Hits The Sydney Morning Herald- @podblack
- HCCC issues a public warning against the AVN - @youngausskeptic
- AVN a risk to public health and safety – HCCC warning - @DrRachie
- PUBLIC WARNING ABOUT THE AUSTRALIAN VACCINATION NETWORK (AVN) - @DrunkenMadMan
- HCCC Reports On AVN’s Website Health Warning FAIL (Help Support Cosmos Magazine And StopAVN!) - @podblack
- Meryl gives me a shout out on Howard Sattler 6PR! - @DrRachie
Further listening:
- 2UE - Ken McLeod - 2010-07-27
- 2UE - Toni McCaffery - 2010-07-27
You are missing some Flash content that should appear here! Perhaps your browser cannot display it, or maybe it did not initialize correctly.
- 6PR - Meryl Dorey - 19-07-2010
You are missing some Flash content that should appear here! Perhaps your browser cannot display it, or maybe it did not initialize correctly.
This is the one that seemed to pander to Meryl's position, although I noticed the host did say at least once that he may not agree with her views.
Trackback URL for this post:
- Gold's blog
- Login or register to post comments


Great idea. I'm not so sure
Great idea.
I'm not so sure that the AVN has or is really seeking legal advice, given their track history it may be a stalling tactic.
"They may promote vaccines, but it's not because they're pro-vaccine." That's true, it's the same in NZ as elsewhere and it's really about public health policy and prevention of disease being much less costly. Believe me, if the vaccine schedule doesn't stack up in terms of preventing disease burden and the associated costs of treatment, it won't be used nor would any individual vaccine. Example would be the TB vaccination, I got it as a child but it was found to have wildly varying efficacy in studies so was withdrawn from the schedule but still used in situations where there is high risk of exposure where it's important to try and prevent individuals contracting it. If there was anywhere near the harm alleged by anti-vaccine groups they wouldn't bother.